Interview

 

I interviewed my daughter.  She is 12 years old and is in 6th grade.  The middle school she attends is the only middle school for all the elementary schools in her district, 4 in total. So, she has been able to expand her social network, even though she still hangs out with mainly the same people.  She got a phone the summer prior to starting middle school. Some of her friends had phones and she would use mine to chat with them. At times that became inconvenient for me. It was then that we decided to look into getting her a phone.  She was given her dad's old phone. But there were definitely rules attached to it.  She is not allowed at this point to have any social media on her phone.  So, my questions that I wanted to ask about social media were tailored to what I already knew about her lack of using it. 

The reasons behind this were two fold. First, she was trying to interact with her friends in a digital way, but it was difficult to do so when she would need to borrow my phone. Second, she would be taking the bus home from school and would arrive home before us.  Therefore, we wanted a way for her to let us know she was home. In Gross' (2012) interview with Turkle, Turkle mentions that this is the parents thinking behind getting phones for their children. 

Doing this interview was interesting.  Since I was doing it with my daughter there were not many things that surprised me by what she said. It was interesting when she said that she did not want to have social media.  When I asked her about what she knew about social media I thought she might have known a bit more about it or that some of her friends might be using it.

The comments about me being on my phone too much was powerful, and it made me think of the interview with Turkle.  In the interview Turkle talks about how parents are texting and missing things that are happening with their children. That parents are on their phones texting, checking email or even on social media.  My daughter’s response that she gives is similar to the interview the Turkle mentions about the boy and his father watching the football games on Sunday. (Gross, 2012)

Below are the questions and answers to the interview:

 

1. What do you use your phone for the most?

 Probably texting or calling my friends and family. Also setting an alarm for school or something.

2. How do you use technology at school?

We use chrome books. We use google classroom which is an app on the Chromebook and teachers can post assignments and kids can do them and turn them in. Its helpful cuz things don’t get lost as much.  You don’t have to worry about things getting ripped or recycled, or spill something on it.  You can find it (work) in one spot.

3. How does technology help you with learning and schoolwork?

Well, it’s helpful because you don’t loose your papers.  If your sick and you don’t have the papers with you, then you can log into google classroom and get the assignment even though you are not at school. You don’t feel like you’re behind.

4. What programs or apps do you use at school?

Google Classroom

Minecraft Edu.

Google Docs,

Google Slides

 World book  that’s where you can find information if you are trying to research something.

Email is really helpful because when you can’t tell a teacher or someone thar your working with something face to face you can email them and its helpful b/c you can get the message and its not too late.  If you forget your homework at school you can email your teachers and let them know or they can give you advice.

5.Which one of these is the most helpful to you as a student? Why?

Probably google classroom b/c you can get stuff done when you’re not at school. Like I said before you don’t have to worry about your work getting lost, ripped, or you don’t have to worry about having a printer.  You click the turn in button that is posted, your teachers can see your work and leave comments saying if it is right or wrong.

6. What do you know about social media?

I don’t really know that much about it b/c I don’t have it and I don’t really want it. What I have on my phone and my chrome book is enough.  I know that a lot of grown ups have it like Facebook.

7. Do any of your friends use social media?  What social media apps do they have?

Um, not that I know of.

8. Do you want to be able to use social media? Why or why not?

No. Just b/c I am fine with what I have, and I feel like you are safer w/o it b/c you don’t have to worry about your account being broken into, like what happened to you (points at me). It stressed me out b/c there were pictures of me, the dogs, and dad.

9. Do you think your parents are on their phones too much?

Yes. I feel like my mom especially when I am trying to talk to her.  She is always on her phone. And then it makes me feel like she is not paying attention and it frustrates me.  And later when, like I go to bring up that same subject she doesn’t remember or know what I am talking about cuz she was on her phone. My dad basically watches skiing or golfing videos which I find boring.

10. How do you feel when your parents are on their phones?

Sometimes frustrated b/c I feel like they are not listening to me, and it makes me mad when I say they are not listening b/c they say they are even though they aren’t.  Sometimes I feel ignored, and I am trying to say something that is important to me, and they are doing their own thing.

11. When is a time that people should not be on technology/phones? Why do you think this?

When they are outside b/c you are supposed to be getting exercise. Maybe when you are at a family or friends b/c its rude to be on your electronics unless you are watching a movie all together.

When you are at the dinner table or a restaurant b/c you are supposed to be spending time together and it feels like your ignoring them which is how I would feel if someone was on their phone.

 

References:

Gross, T (2012, October, 17).Fresh Air. In constant digital contact, we feel ‘alone together’. [Radio Broadcast]. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2012/10/18/163098594/in-constant-digital-contact-we-feel-alone-together.

An Annotated Bibliography of Digital Storytelling 3.12

 

A topic that I am planning to research is the use of digital storytelling within the educational environment.  Nixon (2013) explains that digital story telling “blends image, sound, print, and other communication media in a dynamic real-time environment.” (Center for Digital Storytelling, 2011;Lambert, 2010;Lunby, 2009) (p. 123) Because of the nature of this literacy practice it provides students the opportunity to not have to rely only on print literacy to tell his or her story. Rather students can use other semiotic resources that create meaning in the story being told. Nixon (2013) writes “digital storytelling has the potential to provide youth with opportunities for new sense-making of who they are using digital stories that incorporate images, text, and sound. (p. 124) I find this to be an innovative way in which to engage students into telling their stories as well as other stories. Digital storytelling is like the more traditional ways we are used to telling stories. They have a topic and contain a point of view, but as mentioned already, utilize more multimodalities then paper and publishing technologies. Digital stories are not lengthy, ranging in time form 2-10 minutes.

The topic of digital storytelling is of interest to me because it is not something that I was familiar with as an educator, so I would like to find out more information about it so that I can use it with the teachers at my school or my own classroom. It provides an alternative way for students to share stories. The stories can range from true, historical, non-fiction or even made up. In addition, it can be used with a wide range of ages, and it offers students options to include multimodal elements.

Dreon, O., Kerper, R. and Landis, J. Middle School Journal. Digital storytelling: A tool for teaching and learning in the YouTube generation. (2011). Vol. 42. No. 5. pp. 4-10. Association for Middle Level Education. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23047749.

In this article the authors focus on preservice teachers, who are themselves 21^st century learners or “natives” who are now teaching 21^st century learners within their own classrooms. Dreon et. al (2011) make a point that just because teachers are familiar with using technology, does not necessarily mean it can be used effectively within the classroom. The article focuses on one preservice teacher who uses digital storytelling via YouTube to provide instructional support for his middle school math students.  It is mentioned in the article a few times that if we can draw on students’ interest, they are more likely to engage in learning the content being taught. Digital storytelling can be a medium in which to draw on students’ interest. The authors explain (2011) “Although Tyler’s videos focus on teaching important math concepts, the stories are what ultimately engage his students.”( p. 5) The preservice teachers took a class that focused on digital storytelling and participated in using this medium within their class.  Digital storytelling resembles what students are used to seeing when they are using technology to search and get information. The connection to YouTube demonstrates how digital storytelling is a part of youth culture allowing people to upload short videos and search for information. While this medium can be useful, teachers need to be mindful of student’s ability to access such content.

Hur, J. and Suh, S. (2012). Computers in Schools. Volume 29, p. 320-328. Making learning active with interactive whiteboards, podcasts, and digital storytelling in ELL classrooms.

According to the article by Hur and Suh (2012) the ELL population within schools is increasing. Compared to non-ELL students, ELL students perform lower on achievement assessments. One reason for this according to the article, is the lack of English vocabulary. (Hur and Suh, 2012, p. 321) The article explains a case study done with 3^rd and 4^th grade ELL classrooms and the use of interactive whiteboards, digital storytelling, and the use of podcasts to improve learning with ELL students. According to the article interactive whiteboards including Smartboard and Promethean Boards provide ways in which images, videos and supporting text can be easily shared with students. In addition, students can interact with the images and the board itself.  Digital storytelling provides students practice with oral language as they narrate stories and use other multimedia to make meaning of content being learned. The other media used was podcasts which allow students to hear fluently spoken native language or adjust the speed at which stories are listened as well as the portability of podcasts on phones or tablets.

Eleven students participated in the study during a summer program. The teacher in the study was already consistently using technology in her practice. The results of the study produced positive outcomes for ELL learners and as a result the authors suggest the integration of technology within the classroom.(Hur and Suh, 2012) Students’ vocabulary increased according to pre and post test data. Students liked the interactive whiteboard because they were able to play games as a class which most said helped them learn content. The teacher in the study felt that the interactive whiteboard was useful in showing students images needed to help further explain vocabulary that was new or to help students explain ideas. (p.330)  Also noted by the teacher was the efficiency of using the whiteboard to quickly search for images, thus not losing instructional time with students. (p. 331) According to the students in the study, digital storytelling was helpful to them.  The stories lasted between 2 to 5 minutes and incorporated images and text. Students used Power Point and then an app called Photostory to create presentations. This experience resulted in an improvement in speaking proficiency based on the WIDA levels of students. Parents of students also liked the digital storytelling experience because they were able to watch it numerous times and even share it with other family members. The last technology investigated was the use of podcasts.  Not many students found this useful, but parents liked it because it was the teacher’s voice, and they were able to know what was happening within the classroom. (p. 334)

Lisenbee, P. and Ford, C. (2018, online 2017). Early Childhood Education J Volume 46 pp. 129-139. Engaging students in traditional and digital storytelling to make connections between pedagogy and children’s experiences.

This article focuses on the use of both traditional and digital storytelling within the early elementary classroom. The author’s clarify traditional story telling as the children using actions, using props such as puppets, or matching words from a story to describe an experience from their lives. (2018, p. 129) Digital storytelling incorporates technology such as cell phones, interactive white boards, computers, or tablets. (p.129) Students use the concept of traditional storytelling, but use more multimedia such as images, sound, or video and can be uploaded and saved digitally. Each of these methods is aligned to Common Core Standards. Lisenbee and Ford explain that the use of both traditional and digital storytelling provides students with 21^st century learning skills. The authors write about how each form of storytelling was used in the classroom, both methods provide students with storytelling as social process of interacting with literacy and using a variety of higher order thinking skills, such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration. In the example of traditional story telling the teacher reads the Very Hungry Caterpillar, by Eric Carle. Students retell the story by acting out what happens at each part of the story as it happens. In the author’s recount of digital storytelling, pairs of students are chosen to retell the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears using the SMART board. Students can access clip art and images via The Smart Notebook software (p. 135). While students were able to engage in this task, they struggled with clicking on the correct story to use for the retelling of the story. 

Both traditional and digital storytelling engage students in literacy learning and the social practice that is part of literacy.

This link was taken from Table 3: Resources for teachers; print books, digital books, storytelling websites in the article by Lisenbee and Ford. (p.137)

https://www.storytelling.org/web-resources/

 

Lotherington, H. and Chow, S. (2006). The Reading Teacher Volume 60, Issue 3. Rewriting “Goldilocks” in the urban multicultural elementary school. International Literacy Association.

Working with a school in the Toronto, Canada area with a high number of students who are learning English Lotherington and Chow (2006) write about how they worked with a kindergarten class to retell the classic story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears using digital technology to provide students a way to tell the story from their own culturally perspective and to teach narrative development in early grades. Lotherington explains that as her role as a guest reader in this class, students often chose the Goldilocks story as one for her to read to them. She writes (2006) “ I wanted to work with the teachers and the children to co-create a process of inviting the incipient reader into the narrative-that is, to engage readers as writers with the agency to rework a well-known story.” (p. 244) Lotherington conducted an action research study that was qualitative in nature. It involved the teachers at Joyce Public Schools.

She shares the story of one teacher Sandra Chow who co-wrote this article and is a 2^nd grade teacher. The teacher exposed her class to more classic versions of this fairytale and had the children work on retelling to determine students understanding of the narrative story elements.   Then students were exposed to other versions of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Then it became the students turn to change some of the story elements (ie: characters, setting, or the ending) to create their own version. The teacher provided students with instructions to rewrite his or her version. To do this students used technology and other modalities to create their stories such as Wigglworks, a puppet show, and visual arts, digital photography, and Hyperstudio. (p. 246) In students’ versions of the story the authors (2006) explain that students used versions of themselves with black skin and braids, or even characters like mermaids, sharks, space explorer and more.

According to Lotherington and Chow the project was successful. Teachers were able to incorporate multiliteracies in innovative ways in which students were able to practice comprehension skills and demonstrate agency in telling his or her own version of this story.

Student work images of their retellings:                                                              

(p. 248)                   

   

(p. 249)

(p. 249)

McLellan, H. (2006)Journal of Computing in Higher Education, Vol 19(1), 65-79. Digital storytelling in higher education.

This article explores the emergence of digital storytelling. McLellan (2006) writes that digital storytelling serves “as a valuable tool in subject areas-history, language arts, social studies , teacher training, etc.” (p 68) McLellan (2006) explains the many benefits of digital storytelling such as visual literacy, collaboration, and mastery of technology. Digital storytelling encompasses one’s individual way to tell a story using various media resources. According to the article most digital storytelling is utilized in educational settings or community or civic environments. The power in digital storytelling is how it can be created, saved for future use, and even shared with others. The article explains five different applications used in digital storytelling; personal stories, digital archives, memorial stories, avocational stories, and medicine and health. Personal stories are just as they seem. Telling stories of ourselves and families. The author equates personal stories to photographs of a family photo album but making it digital and telling the stories behind the pictures. One way in which people share stories is through blogs. In this way people are sharing personal stories with others both near and far. Another application for digital storytelling is digital story archives.  These are explained as websites in which people share personal stories, blogs are included in this application as well. Topics include birth, death, food, and romance to name a few examples. (McLellan, 2006, p. 74) Memorial stories are yet another application for digital story telling. These consist of ways in which to remember the stories of groups of people. Some examples from the article are those being effected by September 11^th, those involved in Vietnam, or groups who need to tell their own narratives, such as The Japanese American Legacy Project or American Slaves narratives. (p. 75) The last two application described for digital storytelling are avocational stories and those in medicine and health. Avocational stories tell about those with significant life issues while medicine and health tell the stories of those afflicted with health issues where others can find information or simply connect with others going through similar experiences. The author even mentions the idea of Youtube and MySpace as tools to create digital stories.

References

University of Houston Education. (2023).https://digitalstorytelling.coe.uh.edu/page.cfm?id=27&cid=27&sublinkid=29

Digital Storytelling 1.2: Tools for Digital Storytelling. (2021)https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=mcafee&ei=UTF-8&p=center+for+digital+storytelling&type